archive australian and new zealand architecture and design resources
editorial : moniker wars
HOME > EDITORIAL > FEBRUARY 19 2002

HOME

SELECTED ARCHIVE:

ARCHITECTS
australasian
elsewhere

CONTENT
news archive

ISSUES
heritage
sustainability
forums

PLACES
australasia
europe
americas
the rest

LINKS
schools
zines & blogs
competitions
theory
general
melb consultants
planning + predesign
urban design
practice
computing
weirdness

ABOUT / SERVICES


What gives? Witness this american IT website NEW ARCHITECT. This is the first time I have seen 'IT architects' daring to drop the "IT". Does this mean that we plain old building architects will have to fight for our right to the word 'architect' as this vitamin D deficient mob attempt to cash in on our cachet?

This IT invasion is already causing confusion for people trying to use internet search engines, as words like plan, build, design and the like have been swiped by a quite different industry. The public understanding of the meaning of architecture will steadily erode from here on in without a gutsy response from the institutes.

As these people get paid about three times as much as us improverished old-style architects, they ought to be able to think up a new name for themselves, rather than nick ours. Suggestions please.

Instances of new and weird usages of the word "architect" will be added to this page as they are found.


Havoc for the search engines:

I have been a Web Techniques fan since 1998. Now you're changing the name to New Architect . It doesn't grab me, but I imagine it will grow on me. I truly feel the need in this industry to learn more solid architecting. And that includes both information architecture and database architecture.

A LETTER TO NEW ARCHITECT'S EDITOR FEBRUARY 2002

In talking with readers and vendors, it was clear that the Internet had evolved to the point where people were thinking about it in terms of its architecture. As you mentioned, topics like information architecture, database architecture, and even network architecture are now standard concerns for people who plan and build applications.


NEW ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE FEBRUARY 2002

I beg your pardon:

WestpacTrust's re-architected New Zealand software applications will become, in a sense, pilots from a group perspective...

NEW ZEALAND INFOTECH FEBRUARY 2002

 



05.06.02 Google's testing a snappy new glossary engine. So of course I had to try the "A" word and I'm sad to say architecture as we know it doesn't rate a mention : <<The term architecture can refer to either hardware or software, or to a combination of hardware and software>> GOOGLE GLOSSARY (BETA)

 

DISCLAIMER
butter paper© 2000-2005 HOME ABOUT REV: 02.10.21 xx.xx.02